MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE CHATTHA versus SH. MUHAMMAD YOUNIS
A. XLI, R 19 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Agreement with the List of Re-entry Delays of Section 5 of the Appeal, clearly showed that the appeal was fixed on 17 5 2001 The name of 2001 was correctly printed. There were two criminal cases registered against the single. The High Court Bench had all these issues on one page and on the same day the judicial notice that the computer lists were being provided to the lawyer of their cases, which is an affidavit filed by the appellant and the respondent's oath to his lawyer. The name was not contradicted. The reason for the delay in restoring and delaying the filing of the application for the date of knowledge and application for rehabilitation was not shown.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Noshki lawyer
