Find a Lawyer

FEROZE BEGUM THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEY versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR, KHUSHAB

Suit for declaration of title lease purchase agreement, section 42 land development authority act (XV of 1949), section 30 registration act (XVI of 1908), section 72 and 77 convent martyrdom (10 of 1984), article 129 (g). The Development Authority had allotted the plot to the plaintiff in 1952, the lease agreement was executed and it was registered on 30 195 1952. The construction was canceled because the plaintiff had filed an appeal in 1979 that it had been accepted by the Assistant Director Housing and Physical Planning Department that all submissions for registration were made. Strar was brought before the lease purchase agreement and registration under Section was refused to be called a failed order under 77, the claimant had filed a lawsuit to declare the grant. The property director's housing and physical planning department was not produced in the civil judge's court, dismissing both the lawsuit and the appeal. The contents of this document were not attempted to prove through secondary evidence. In 1979 orders were obtained on the ballot appeal. In 1989 the charges were submitted. The witness did not appear. The witnesses did not say anything about the property. The plaintiff withheld the best evidence. Type deficiencies and not illegal were identified in circumstances r \ n power of attorney advocate Shogram lawyer