AMIR KHAN versus STATE
Articles 302 (6) / 34,324 / 34 & 337 F (ii) / 34 Definition of Evidence Defendants were named in the FIR along with their specific roles in which the ocular account was taken seriously through medical evidence. Was gone, the ocular evidence was reliable, coherent, consistent and reliable, the minor contradictions in the evidence of the prosecution were of no avail to the defense; no question of false implication or substitution could arise in the defense case. There were no legs of weakness or absence of respondents to demonstrate. The presence of an unbelievable and untrustworthy eye witness account will not make any difference and it has been alleged that he will not create any mitigating situation in favor of the accused for the lesser punishment, while equipped with firearms. A moderate and disturbing attack was made which resulted in his death. Witnesses of legal proceedings retained in custody for death and injury for those killed and injured.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer