Find a Lawyer

ARSHIA AZHAR versus MST. SARWAT IMTIAZ

Section 2 (3), 15, 26A, 30, 33 and 39 Stamp Act (Second 1899), Section 2 (15) and Article 45 Arbitration Agreement Reference Roll of Court Stamp Duty Question Parties Parties Tool In the constitutional petition, the High Court belonged to the same family and was in dispute over joint family property; they jointly appointed sole arbitrator and filed a trial court award to settle their dispute in a happy manner. With the record and sent to civil. After the court pronounced these objections, the trial court filed this award as a principle of application of judicial justification under section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the trial was heard by the parties in the civil court. That was, after the trial, these objections were dismissed and the award court rule was made, the way the parties were given the award for their dispute resolution, written arguments, before the award was made. Annexes were obtained, the arbitrator sued. Its good reasons for justifying its award, though understood by the consent of the parties, would serve as a distribution tool, payable under stamp duty law, both appeals dismissed in the circumstances. had gone famous supreme court advocate from Sajawal lawyer