The issuance of a check guarantee for the accused was that he had presented a check to repay the debt, which was dishonest on the offer, in accordance with Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 489F. It was alleged that the check in question was. Was not released for consideration but only one transaction was guaranteed. The complainant claimed that in the past three similar FI rupees were also registered against the accused, therefore, he was a habitual offender. No one has been deprived of the criminal trial of the nature of the accused charged with the exemption of bail. The question is whether the question was issued dishonestly, which can be fixed only after the recording of the evidence. I did not come under the prohibition clause of section 497, the PC accused was admitted on bail accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
