Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAHEEM ALIAS NAUMAN versus STATE

Sections 6767 AA and 7 377 Kidnapping or abduction for the sake of unnatural lust, unnatural crime The value of the evidence was prosecuted on the two old accused since they were 14 to 16 years old. Medical evidence did not prove unnatural crime with the victim and did not confirm her statement and this is not the reason why she was being identified. Correctional nature was of no importance; when important evidence about the commission of the crime was unreliable, it was suspicious to safely assemble anal swabs at the Chemical Examiner's office as the prosecution witness testified by the prosecution. Resigned as unnecessary suspects were acquitted under circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• NASEER AHMAD v. State 2013 MLD 1238
• HASSAN RANA v. State 2013 YLR 1239
• SAEED AHMAD v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER POLICE STATION SADDAR, SANGLA HILL 2013 PCrLJ 1240
• BAKHT ALI v. MUHAMMAD SHABBIR 2013 MLD 1246
• GEPCO v. Malik WAQAS AHMAD 2013 PLC(CS) 1250
• RAZA SERVICES through Attorney v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), MULTAN 2013 PTD 1251
• MUHAMMAD LATIF v. State 2013 YLR 1257
• UMER DRAZ v. State 2013 MLD 1257

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

registration advocate from Darya Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes