Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus RAJA IFTIKHAR ALI KHAN

SSS & 35 and lit 35 All costs for damages based on unlawful litigation are in the form of a dismissal The previous trial filed by the plaintiff was in favor of the respondents and the trial court. The order was upheld by the appellate court, but the High Court set aside the conclusions of the two courts at no cost. Before the Supreme Court, which was rejected by the defendants along with the costs filed by the High Court, though the High Court dismissed it and the High Court's decision and order was upheld, the High Court passed an order in respect of the expenditure. The appellant could file an expense bill or if the court could provide for exemption costs, but no separate case could be filed to recover our damages after the Supreme Court's final resolution. In previous litigation, the respondents had filed suit against the appellant and others, but at present the appellant did not execute the others for the damages against which all the parties had submitted. The suit was not filed. Defendants and others filed suit Appellant did not file any cost bill after the Supreme Court decision in the previous case Appellant could not maintain a separate case The order passed by the High Court intervened by the Supreme Court. Did not guarantee property advocate from Kashmore lawyer