Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus KHASMIR STEEL AND RE-ROLLING MILLS

Article 52 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Articles 42 and 44, through a writ petition between the jurisdictional consumers and the Department of Electricity, brought the agreement into conflict between the parties. They are between the terms and conditions. The parties were followed, processed, or disputed questions of fact concerning the contractual obligation between the parties that constituted the decision of the Committee, which was called into question in the jurisdiction of the writ That was, a detailed investigation was needed, which was beyond the scope. High Court case in writ jurisdiction In such cases, the High Court will not accept its jurisdiction. The essence of the writ petition filed by the consumer was to withdraw from the terms of the agreement between him and the Department of Electricity, regardless of the terms. Exceeding or exceeding the limit of the department, the question of enforceability of the agreement was the determination of disputed questions of factuality under the High Court Writ Petition under Section 44 of the AJK Interim Constitution Act of 1974. And determination can be issued only when there is a violation of law or legal obligation. law firms from Gambet lawyer