RIAZUR RAHMAN versus MUHAMMAD URS
Arts 79 and 17 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 12 suits for specific performance of the sale agreement and the number of witnesses, proof of document implementation, certified document of the two by law, Has shown that a witness presented by the plaintiff (sales contract) was signed as a mere author and not as a witness, so such person cannot be considered a witness and the evidence of such person , The law does not meet the requirements of Article 79 of the Martyrs 1984. The second witness, who was alive at the time, was therefore deadly and according to the provisions contained in Article 79 of the Conan testimony, 1984, the sale agreement should not be used as a contract, the district judge, in the circumstances, was The law was attested by ignoring the provision of Article of79 of the 1984 evidence and mistakenly finding that the sale agreement was proved and the decision was approved by the disinfectant. Strict judges were not sustainable in the law and as a result, they were kept in a court and the trial court's order dismissing the trial was reinstated by the high court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Ghizer lawyer