Find a Lawyer

ALI GOHAR ALIAS GORO versus STATE

Claims 302, 324, 460 and 34 of the testimony were appraised by the three eyewitnesses, who were also injured, in the same incident, the accused was identified in the identification test; The check was made, but nothing was recorded for the notoriety. Their evidence was evidence of the evidence of the complainant and the evidence of the prosecution was proved by the medical evidence. The oral testimony of the prosecution was proved. The accused and his accomplice have committed the crime. Convicted of a domestic crime, but then said that the house and the incident took place in the street when, under Section 111, serious crime would be committed while staying at home, PPCs will leave once the culprits leave the house. Then the crime of adultery in the house will be eliminated. The accused had hurt the prosecution witness after the crime. Yes, the PPC was acquitted, and in the rest of the case, the prosecution proved the case against the accused. Any reasonable suspicions and convictions were imposed on the accused in connection with the remaining offenses, retained, the conviction was ordered to proceed with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC. law firms from Jatoi lawyer