Sections 12 and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), in support of the couple's OX suit for the specific performance of the contract sale and grant agreement, were contrary to the statements of the parties and their witnesses by the court With the documents produced, the defendant was not present in the city at the date of execution of the alleged sale agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant, the witnesses were also testified through the sale agreement or the receipt, which was the subject of this case, The signatures were never signed by the defendant as both of these documents appear to be signed, the defendant said. The case on the basis of fake sales contracts signed more powerful than the claimant was totally different. Not entitled to any relief claiming that the suit was dismissed accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
