MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus STATE
Section 497 of the Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 bail, was denied by the judicial officer before the alleged torture of the accused by two eyewitnesses, which stated that the two witnesses were the accused as one of the offenders. Had chosen to be. The suspect's rifle was the recovery of the evidence, although it was collected after the alleged torture, but the evidence can be examined when all the evidence will be presented to the trial court, along with evidence of the alleged violence. Deep testimony was needed, but only a temporary review of the evidence was needed at the bailout stage. Even if the benefit of the rifle recovery was given to the accused, there was still evidence to test the identity of the two eyewitnesses. Available on a reasonable basis to attach to the commission of the crime. The accused was involved in the case which came under the prohibited clause under Section 497, CRPC, The accused was not entitled to a discount, bail, bail application.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Sagri lawyer
