Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR


Section A Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Applicant's suit on the legal status of the Canal Order for conducting a water course on the land of the applicant was decided by the trial court and affirmed by the Appellate Court. Had done in it too. The order states that the defendant shall not be barred from moving the application under section 68A of the Canal and Sewerage Act, 1873. Applicant's position for the rehabilitation of the water course was that the civil case was finally decided by the civil court and he could not do so. Will reopen under the Canal and Drainage Act, 1873. Under the Validity Matter Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, which provided for appropriate relief in case of any dispute under which the order of the Court of Appeal was in accordance with the law and did not infringe the applicant's rights. Identified in invalid order, revision deleted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.