Section 302 (b) Definition of Qatil-e-Amad evidence The benefit of the doubt The complainant alleged that the delay in filing the medical evidence FIR regarding the failure to confirm the collective story and the post-mortem of unnatural witnesses alleged 5 to 6 days before the incident, the accused and the victim quarrel. On the day of the incident, the accused came to the victim's house, while he was armed, and took him away on the pretext of joining the marriage, after which the prosecution's witnesses pursued the accused and prosecuted the accused under Section 302. Saw firing on the court. b) According to the PPC and the complainant who was sentenced to death, the accused and the accused were disputed before the incident, then it is unclear why the victim was with the accused, who was allegedly present at the time. Armed, and not even witnesses. Eyewitnesses followed the suspect, assuming that the relationship between the accused and the deceased had been settled and that the dispute had been settled between them, then no need for prosecution witnesses to prosecute the accused. And he allegedly witnessed the killing of the victim, shortly afterwards. The complainant returned to inform, but no one thought it appropriate to notify the police and instead opted to search, the body of the victim's complainant alleged that they spent the entire night on the body of the deceased. The site did find, however, that the site of the alleged incident, which was seen by prosecutors' witnesses, and the location from where the corpse was recovered, was not far away. Therefore, the complainant must find the body within a short period of time
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
