MST. SAFIA BIBI versus RETURNING OFFICER, DARGAI
16 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for nomination papers, the names, parents and numbers in the list of proposers and the second voter, as well as the papers of the Union Council and Ward were left vacant. Was. The candidate had some signatures at the place that was intended for the proposer, but no sign or thumb mark was found at the place which meant the second. These were ideally incomplete papers that were rejected, and thus were rejected and the appeal was also unsuccessful because the appropriately named candidate did not have any evidence to show who was a candidate and The second candidate was set to submit the full nomination papers, but the candidate failed to find a proposer and another person at the appropriate time. Extension time could not be granted to fill the lacuna Other candidates were not favored by candidate Vlaab. Lee rejects nomination papers and submits them to other candidates, not heard
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Laliah lawyer