Find a Lawyer

SARDAR HAROONUR RASHID versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Section 152 (1) (i) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution nomination papers rejected nomination papers rejected by applicants on the request that they have concealed their assets, the Returning Officer issued a Discussed the matter. Candidates and others did not discuss the matter. Appeal against the order of the Returning Officer or any other candidate filed on the cross objection was not discussed in the appeal phase. This point cannot be discussed for the first time in the constitutional application district. Is. The Returning Officer concluded on appeal that the defects in the declaration form of the assets submitted by the candidates were neither intentional nor for the lower purpose that the District Returning Officer accepted the appeal and made the disputed order a factual question. The District Returning Officer made the opinion. The basis of the record when more than one opinion may be formed on the basis of a particular aspect, ts at the original or appeal stage and such an opinion was constituted by a competent forum at that stage, then formed while dealing with the constitutional petition. Outgoing feedback cannot be changed based on an opinion created by the District Returning Officer. The constitutional petition cannot be interfered with for concrete reasons, since the recording of the completed evidence and the depth of the case and the depth of the matter was beyond the scope of the constitutional application. top advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer