HAQ NAWAZ KHAN versus STATE
Section 616161 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 406 and 403/34 Termination of FIR Parties to Resolve Their Contribution Disputes Arbitrators Rs. 500,000 from Each Party as Security Instead of depositing the money in the hands of the complainant, more than two vehicles with relevant documents were demanded, the carpet was that the arbitral authority corruptly transferred both vehicles to the applicant, using the same. And the arbitrators did not announce the award but they were demanding Rs. 1,50,000. As a compensation and the vehicles were not returned, along with legal documents, the complainant practically complained that the complainant never intended to take any retaliatory action against the petitioner and the arbitrators, namely the return of the documents, the police. Outside of the liability case was a civil liability if the vehicle was misused or someone was able to maintain a homicide, a lawsuit for damages, the FIR was terminated
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Samundri lawyer
