Find a Lawyer

STATE versus UBAIDULLAH

Section 1 561 An Exploratory Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) for an order dismissing a request for a magistrate to pass an invalid order Had done it, had no jurisdiction. In this case, the judge had to provide the required police custody to the magistrate as a special court hearing under the Anti-Corruption Rules, or alternatively, to prepare the accused before the court of competent jurisdiction. Needed to be instructed. , The magistrate did not properly apply his mind to the trial, while approving the expulsion of the accused / defendants, the magistrate filed the case through the Investigation Officer before the registration of the case and the arrest of the accused / respondents. Content was largely ignored even if the content in the meantime was collected. The investigation did not say enough to approve further police custody; it should have been denied custody only with the direction of GE. From a court of competent jurisdictional order, the magistrate did not take notice that the case was lawful. According to the lawsuit, the civil court was filed before the controversial recovery process and misinterpreted the law, saying there could be no lawsuit. In addition to the registration based on the fake documents presented in the civil court, the court magistrate also ignored the fact that the accused / respondents were not only accused of forgery in preparation for deportation, but also of Under section 419, 420 and fines, fraud was also imposed list of supreme court advocates from Sihala lawyer