Find a Lawyer

ADIL JAMSHED versus MUHAMMAD UBAIDULLAH

The execution of the pro note in question was proved satisfactorily by independent and credible witnesses in the suit for recovery of the money on the basis of A. XXXVII, Rr 2 and 3 and O XX, R 5 Pro Note, said the witnesses. Was given a lengthy and cross-examination to investigate, but his integrity cannot be broken. My claim was not processed and executed by the victim, and no attention was paid to it, there was no result, no result, but at the trial , He acknowledged the same but with a different story about the purchase of the goods dispute, the refusal earlier and subsequent admission by the defendant clearly revealed his conduct and It was pointed out that the person who did not care for what he claimed / alleged was a special fact and wanted the court to believe that Such a fact exists, which was to prove that the trial court had initiated the matters involved. The trial, in its original context, appreciated the evidence on record and came to a reasonable conclusion that the findings of trial court were not only in accordance with the law on the subject but also on the evidence presented on the record. Was detected. The trial court, in full consideration of the evidence, pointed out that any material was not read or misread, leading to the trial court's disqualification or illegal trial court to regularly consider all material facts of the case. Can keep After doing so, a detailed and meaningful decision was recorded, which was recorded by O. how to become a advocate from Ghotki lawyer