SHAUKAT ALI ALIAS BOOTA versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 11 bail, Section 164, in its statement by the magistrate, further inquiry complaint / alleged victim's grant, CRPC It was clearly stated that he was not kidnapped by the accused nor was he subjected to adultery. That his signatures were obtained on plain paper on the promise that some land in his name would be transferred and he requested that the case be dismissed against the accused as the investigation in this case was complete and the accused for that purpose. Was not needed. No probable cause for investigation or recovery could be accomplished if he was incarcerated, the accused was behind bars after his arrest, under Section 164, Cr. In view of the alleged victim's statement, there were enough grounds to believe the case. There was further investigation from the accused and the accused was admitted on bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Gujar Khan lawyer
