Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAMSHAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b), 310 and 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), Section 345 between the accused trial court accused and the legal heirs, and after the conviction of the accused, the trial court's decision on appeal by the accused Was filed against. There was a compromise between the deceased Sessions Judge's accused and the legal heirs, which informed the truth of the recorded statements of the deceased's legal heirs and the fact of the agreement was conveyed to the parties. The compromise between the two parties was fully proven and was effected without any external pressure from their free will and consent. The deceased's legal heirs have stated that the appeals filed by the accused were accepted, their conviction and sentence were set aside. And they got worse and were released jobs for advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer