Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324 and 34 bail, under the grant of further inquiry, the accused was an empty hand, no one was hurt during the alleged incident FIR. It appears that the accused had picked up only one person, Lalkar and did nothing more. The complaining party had reached the scene of the incident. During the investigation, the accused party had prepared a cross version, It was the complaining party that was the assailant and injured two people in which the accused belonged to the party. The accused himself was completely suppressed by the injuries of the accused during a similar incident which was completely suppressed in the FIR, in the FIR's question regarding the accused sharing a common intention with his co-accused. There was no direct connection and there was a question about the alleged responsibility for the alleged crime. Compiled by his accomplices, they were questions that required further investigation into the scope of Section 497, 2 (2) of the PC accused. immigration advocates phone number from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer