Find a Lawyer

MST. SAHBI BEGUM versus STATE

Before the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302, the accused's grant was not designated in the FIR but it came to the inquiry officer through a request made by the victim's brother and allegedly. Was sworn in by the prosecution's witness. The FIR alleged that there was no witness to the murder, the deceased's identity was not identified at the time of his discovery and the perpetrators of the alleged crime were unknown. Six days after the deceased was last seen in the company of the accused, he asked whether such anecdotal evidence had examined the proximity, a question which sought further inquiry which revealed There was a blood wound to the back of the body. The victim's head, but no post-mortem examinations report that there was any injury to the body in the chemical examination. Iner's report further said that no poison was found in the corpses. The doctor said it was not possible to ascertain the cause of the victim's death. The statement of, cannot be fully established without any basis or investigation of substance. The officer had stated that the suspect had already joined the investigation, two co-accused were already admitted after arrest warrant and appeared in the case of the accused in the case of the co-accused, As far as the goodwill is concerned, the ad interim pre-arrest warrant is already approved The accused was confirmed, in the circumstances famous lower court advocate from Mari Indus lawyer