Find a Lawyer

MISS MEHAK HASNAIN versus SELECTION COMMITTEE

Article 199 Constitutional Application Academic Entrance 1st Year MBB Section Course Petitioner submitted application form for admission to one of the special seats on the district merit of the Medical College Department Course as well as a special seat for doctors / children. ? The father was working as an Associate Professor at the relevant college and his mother, as a doctor in the Department of Health, submitted three application forms for admission to the first year MBB section course against the District Merit seats, And Doctors \ Children's Category \ A \ & \ B categories Responding to a seat respondent who could not be admitted to District Merit, its forms are considered for category \ A \ & \ B \ Children's seats. As it was in serial number 1 in both categories and it entered the set allotted for the category. \ A \ Respondents gave contentious elections while submitting three application forms; first time, their first priority was for District merit seat and second priority category was for B \ Respondent failed to get district merit seat. The second priority was in the Category B, but the selection committee chose instead to admit the choice that it had. It was filed against the category, Category A against A, which could not be contrary to the object and option used by the candidate, and the admissions policy also always preferred the candidate when used in his or her application form, In the light of the admission policy, all intentions and purposes for admission to the qualification shall be final, with the selection committee disagreeing and abusing its powers in the category of jobs for fresh advocates from Qalandarabad lawyer