Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ALI RAZA versus STATE


Section 497 (XLV of 1860), section 397 and 511 offenses (Enforcement Act) Ordinance (VII of 1979); 1979, the case did not come to fruition because the accused person's kidnapping was not charged against the accused who himself confessed in the FIR that the accused attempted to commit corruption, Section 511, pp. C was attracted in this case provided for half the punishment punishable under Section 7 377, against the accused under PPC offense, did not come under the prohibited clause of section 49 of, CCPC K There was no evidence to show that it was committed corruption cases infected with Section 497 (2), PCP meaning in grants bail to suspect accusers investigation

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Hattar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.