Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI versus STATE

The FIR was promptly filed in appreciation of the provisions of Sections 302, 324, 397, 427 and 34, and the fact that the account submitted by the complainant in the FIR was sufficiently detailed. The intended party did not intend to falsely add anyone. Regarding the highway robbery / robbery incident, it was hardly expected that the accused was formerly known as the complaining party, as allegedly, and it was said that the result of the incident. I wasted two innocent lives, which is how it was described. In the FIR, the ocular account was fully proved by the complainant and the injured witness, it was alleged that it was dark at night or the accused's name was not listed in the FIR, no clear evidence in court. The statement below was not on record to plead for denial. The correction of the incident by the prosecution's witnesses, as given in the FIR, was fully supported by the prosecution's witnesses, which was fully supported and confirmed by the Medical Magistrate's ocular account through medical evidence. On the basis of which the trial court sentenced and sentenced the trial court in connection with the sentencing and said that the two accused were retained. ; As a third defendant's case, the statement of the prosecution's witness was not substantiated by any other material on the record. No identification was paraded in relation to the accused. In this case, it would be unsafe to rely on the sole source of the prosecution's testimony. Interest in secure administration of justice will be required divorce advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer