Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAUF versus HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

Sections 9, 12 and 22 have been sued by the Bank for the recovery of debts filed by the Ex parte, Appellant: This application has been claimed under Section 12 (Finance Recovery) Ordinance 2001 of Financial Institutions. They are neither lenders, guarantors nor mortgages. Property about which it was alleged that they had a mortgage because the appellant did not own the property through the bail / mortgage when the alleged mortgage was claimed and that they had previously The mortgaged property and documents were sold by the respondent. (Attorney), who formerly had the power of attorney, but was terminated by the acquisition of such Power of Attorney job by the sale of the entire property by the appellant Question whether the appellant was the property owner in question. And property mortgages can be kept by the respondents. (Attorney) needs evidence, but without the formulation of the cases below and the trial under it, the court briefly dismissed the request that was inconsistent with the law and the impeachment order was set aside. And the case was presented to the court for the following decision on the appeal of the appeals filed under Section 12 (Financial Compensation) Ordinance 2001 of the financial institutions by compiling the cases and recording of the evidence. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ranipur lawyer