Find a Lawyer

MASHKOOR HUSSAIN SHAH versus MUNAWAR SHAH

For the parties' declarations and permanent injunctions, the Section & 42 and Su Su case showed that there was no dispute about the specific survey number and all the courts had not found any dispute in this regard, including the High Court. The courts found that the parties owned equal shares. As far as the survey number is concerned, the dispute was limited to another survey number The respondents claimed that because of an agreement they were the owners of the suit land while the appellant made one-half of its proprietary claim. To the extent claimed. With respect to the aforementioned suit land prima facie, there was no contractual agreement available, another survey number decree for a permanent injunction in favor of the respondents said that another survey number is not the courts below and Under the mistaken impression of the High Court, it is deemed to have been compromised. During the previous litigation, the hearing of the High Court order was effected in connection with the said survey number through the Supreme Court and the matter was referred to the trial court which will proceed according to the law. famous high court advocate from Kurram lawyer