Find a Lawyer

KABOOL KHAN versus SHAMOON THROUGH L.RS.

Article 42 Q Declaration of Legislation (1984 1984 1984), Article Constitution89 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (3 19733), Article (185 (())) Declaration of Public Documents Property Identification Legally the plaintiff owns the disputed shop. Claimed but the defendants claimed that the trial took place in the shop trial court in favor of the plaintiff, but the appellate court accepted the appeal and the order passed by the appellate court in Appellate Court Held under the jurisdiction - The plaintiff's intention was to be exhibited during the trial and prepared by the defendants. Subsequent documents cannot be considered because they were not acceptable because the accuracy report prepared by the defendants cannot be considered valid because the High Court decided not to review the report. One will be justified and the decision of the appellate court will be retained in the context of the re-existing documents. The document entered by the defendants in which the disputed shop number was established was the property of the defendants at the shop by the settlement authorities. Was issued to prove any registered sale-off under the plaintiff's title Failed to submit documentation for any topic other than the deed. Its illegal registered sale process was not enough to consider the sale at Rs. 99 was not sufficient to prove the plaintiff's proprietary rights to the shop in dispute. The High Court upheld the review filed by the plaintiff. Refused to appeal registration advocate from Kharan lawyer