MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus GHULAM HUSSAIN
Article 12 law evidence (10 of 1984), arts 72 and 79 constitution pakistan (1973), article 185 (3) specific performance of the contract to sell the document, was held concurrently with the evidence of the discovery of facts under the courts below. ? The defendant entered into a contract of sale with the claimant and received the first installment of the sale price. The plaintiff had to complete the sale and provide possession by a certain date in which he failed to show that the plaintiff presented two trivial witnesses to prove the sale agreement and rejected the evidence headed by the receipt claimant suit. No viable evidence was presented to the court, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff and the decision was upheld by the High Court at the appeal jurisdiction. In concurring decisions, the Supreme Court found that no specific question of law of public importance was raised by the defendant's leave. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Killa Saifullah lawyer