Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE


Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal Against Dispute Disputes Found Between General Evidence of Both Eyes' Witnesses, Fir and Medical Evidence Read, Allegedly a Was related to injuries caused by the person. The investigation was also found innocent by the Investigation Officer who recommended his departure and report, so it was confirmed by the Inspector General and the DIG Range (Crime) that the commission of the murder of the victim was responsible. There was no reliable evidence on the saddle charged with. In view of the contradictions in ocular testimony and medical evidence, the prosecution's case was suspected, which had to be extended to the accused, under the circumstances of the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under the Article, the Supreme Court acquitted It was bad. 185 (3) of the Constitution did not consider it appropriate to interfere with the High Court's decision

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.