Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal Against Dispute Disputes Found Between General Evidence of Both Eyes' Witnesses, Fir and Medical Evidence Read, Allegedly a Was related to injuries caused by the person. The investigation was also found innocent by the Investigation Officer who recommended his departure and report, so it was confirmed by the Inspector General and the DIG Range (Crime) that the commission of the murder of the victim was responsible. There was no reliable evidence on the saddle charged with. In view of the contradictions in ocular testimony and medical evidence, the prosecution's case was suspected, which had to be extended to the accused, under the circumstances of the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction under the Article, the Supreme Court acquitted It was bad. 185 (3) of the Constitution did not consider it appropriate to interfere with the High Court's decision immigration advocates email from Talagang lawyer