COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE versus FARHAN MAHMOOD AND OTHERS
Section 16 Imports and Exports (Control) Act (XNXIxXX 1950), Section 3 (1) Passenger Goods (Import) Rules, 1998, R2 (C) CBR Directive No. C No 10 (5) L&P / 91, dated 2 2001 2001 Imports of Motorcycles in Personal Goods Motorcycles imported into personal belongings were seized by the customs authorities High Court. Validation under the Private Goods Scheme CBR Induction No. C (10) L&P / 91, 2 2 For the benefit of the date of 2001, the burden was on the passengers to prove that they were in their luggage in Pakistan. I was coming with motorcycles when they were using the same thing. No such evidence was presented on the record, therefore, CBR guidelines did not advance the issue of passengers. The available records indicate that a few days before the passengers were brought to Paki, the country was left under the passenger box (Import) Rules 1998 to return the motorcycle to the excuses of motorbikes and hence the customs. Authorities justified in seizing the same Supreme Court, after examining Section RO. Earlier, the law had noted that it would not be fair to assume that the Adjudicating Authority refused to recover the passengers of the motorcycle if it was declared smuggling of some items without exercise in light of the relevant Section R. Was. Authorities get remand for new decision to re-adjudicate cases after court case observations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer