Find a Lawyer

MESSRS CHAUDHRY WEAVING FACTORY versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH VICE-PRESIDENT/GENERAL ATTORNEY

Section 18 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXI, R 90 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 166 Do not deposit 20% of the auction amount processed in the application of the decree, 20% in managing the auction amount Failure Effective Decision Guides filed an objection against the property auction but failed to submit 20% of the auction amount under OXI, R90, the CPC Banking Court did so within the stipulated period. Objection request for non-submission of money It was that the court did not extend the period for depositing so much money as it could not arrange the amount within the period on which the court of competence of the execution court instructed the interested persons to pay the auction amount. Submitted on a fixed date, could not take advantage of the extension period despite the obligations of this decision, and in accordance with the position of the persons who executed the court for the extension of time that failed to collect the required amount, They could not arrange for a deposit. Such request was not considered a valid and legal basis for extension. It may be, the sum of 20 of the petitioner was entertained by the unlawful decision to entertain the plea of the object which was prevented by the judges from taking up the petition which they had taken in their objection request, as the petition was made for their own actions and The assignment was not made by the court because of mistakes and they could not be held guilty except by themselves. The court did not face any legal malpractice / error and the same situation was maintained power of attorney advocate Haripur lawyer