Find a Lawyer

HAFIZ MUKHTAR AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appointment Applicant who according to an advertisement applied for the position of Assistant / Head Clerk through the appropriate channel, was selected for the post and he was suitably appointed. Petitioner was appointed on, but was not allowed to attend duty due to alleged restriction on recruitment under the direction of the Chief Minister, selection of non-applicants was impeccable and prior to the issuance of the alleged recruitment ban letter. This was done. Applicants could not be banned from terminating such appointment and appointment, without violating any rule or law, after the selection process was completed, without violating any rule or law. No charges were laid against him. That their selection was not on the merits or that their appointment was violated. The issue of any rule / regulation was that the applicant's case stood in a very good and high position because not only he was selected, but he was also appointed and appointed. The posting order was also issued and it was only at the time of inclusion in this report that when he was facing recruitment ban, the interpretation of the authorities' directive to ban the recruitment process was suspended. , This cannot be accepted as a valid approach because if the effect of this order is already finalized other new appointments. It was carried out the same treatment to be selected, but this request was grateful that suffered such agony and dilemma situation, suffered such injustice and strict construction, recruitment Participants attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer