Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR versus STATE

The pre-arrest bail, section 308, 148, and 149 pre-arrest guarantees of section 498, the defendant's grant was not connected to the purpose established in the FIR and did not cause any injury to any person during the alleged incident. Had arrived and alleged that the accused had been charged. In the FIR, only the accused in connection with the ineffective shootings did not resort to firing on the spot and he was present outside the complainant's house only at the time of the alleged incident. Did not commit Had already been involved in the investigation and nothing could be recovered from his possession, otherwise, if a weapon was recovered from the suspect's possession, it could not be concluded because it is being alleged that the accused. Was equipped with a pistol on the persons concerned. At the time, but no pistol-free crime was recovered from the scene of the incident, it was alleged that he should not be deprived of his freedom merely for the purpose of impacting rehabilitation. He was alleged to have been legally incompetent because he considered a close friend of the principal suspect and was therefore wrongly implicated in the case so that he could illegally defend the principal accused. Could not follow the case. Regarding any motive charged against the accused, it would not have been possible to present the accused without any substance or foundation which the accused had already confirmed in the circumstances, before the ad interim pre-arrest warrant. Was immigration advocates email from Kotla lawyer