Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ROYAL ENGINEERING THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR versus MESSRS HABIB BANK LTD. THROUGH MANAGER

Defendant's plea for leave to file Section 10 full documentation and to defend it alleges that the money already paid by him was not adjusted by the Baltic and he was included in the obligation and The defendants further alleged that the manager of the bank's branch misused their financial affairs. In connection with such allegations, the leave of the case filed before the Banking Court was not included with the petition for defense and defense, so the application was dismissed, the defendants of the validity were allowed to file all the documents. It should have been placed before the court as in their absence, the banking court, in deciding the application. It was appropriate for the defendants to examine these documents, if the documents were before the Banking Court, it was appropriate that the Banking Court be agreed to appear for leave and defend the defendants' claim. Should have filed all the documents together. With his leave request, which he failed to do, the court in the interest of justice, refused to punish the defendant because of such error, such documents defendant's allegations. It is of the utmost importance that upon filing a complaint by him, the manager was dismissed from the job and the charges filed in the slip by the respondents filed on the FIR show that He deposited some money and he was not adjusted to his account. The High Court rejected the order submitted by the banking court. With advocate from Renala Khurd lawyer