SYED ZARIF HUSSAIN SHAH versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), JHANG
Sections 10 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Treatment for the Retention of Controversies Reality Disputes Colombo Plan Scheme Proprietary Rights, Applicant's Approval of the Case Proposed to Supply Proprietary Rights, 'S requests were passed rather than decided. The petitioner's order against him was that the order passed by the Revenue Authorities was not in accordance with the provisions of Section 24 of the Government Lands (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912. Before this case, there was more than one legal alternative treatment available. Under the provisions of the law, the taxation powers, so the constitutional petition was not maintainable, could not be resolved without recording the evidence of the parties to the dispute, which was not valid in the eyes of the law, as the High Court rarely entered into evidence Stated using the options under Article 199. Controversial question of the applicant is included and the High Court had no jurisdiction in the constitutional jurisdiction of justice and fair play in the High Court to resolve such question and take into account the specific circumstances of the case, Applicant was allowed ten days to consult authorities for alternative treatment treatment accordingly disposed of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
