Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus MUHAMMAD NADEEM

Article 4040 & 9439 Legislative evidence (10 of 1984), Article 161 Object and the purpose of Section 5540, PCP send alleged weapons recovered from the body of the deceased in a forensic science laboratory for review. The complaint was filed through a complaint filed by the trial court, which allowed the trial court to file an application through one of the defendants in which it claimed that the body of the victim was recovered. Weapons recovered from the suspects should be sent to the forensic science laboratory to determine if the lead was a bullet. Whether or not the pistol was fired, the petitioner / complainant alleged that the application was filed with a three-year delay, when the prosecution's evidence was almost almost exhausted. The purpose of this petition was to meet the lack of evidence and that under Section 540, the CCPC court could only ask for one person, namely a human being, and there was no further evidence. Applied for litigation just one week after the inspection. It is not said that, in these cases, where the filing was delayed somewhat, the trial court itself had to decide whether the failure of the investigating officer to send the lead bullet was intentional or unintentional. The conclusion was that the forensic science laboratory would provide a great deal of help in reaching a fair verdict of the case, it could not be termed as baseless or unrealistic and could not be said about the forensic science laboratory. I would suggest irrelevant in which the evidence of the prosecution almost almos property advocates from Panjgur lawyer