KHALID SAEED versus HAMEEDUD DIN GHORI
A. XXXVII, for receipt of money on the basis of Pro Note 2 and 3, a receipt for payment of the amount and money received from the plaintiff to the plaintiff and the pro note was regularly processed and the defendant's The source note was submitted and after recording the evidence of the parties in the Appellate Tribunal, no appeal was made in the Appeal Trial Court for the presence, validity and legality of the case, the evidence on the record is that It was proved that the defendant had claimed that he had paid the original amount. The plaintiff with two checks made a profit, but she could not prove it by any evidence, while the evidence on the record had fully proved that the defendant's money was ever paid to the plaintiff. Was not made and was properly pronounced by the trial court. Dismiss
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Khangah Sharif lawyer
