Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHALID SAEED versus HAMEEDUD DIN GHORI


A. XXXVII, for receipt of money on the basis of Pro Note 2 and 3, a receipt for payment of the amount and money received from the plaintiff to the plaintiff and the pro note was regularly processed and the defendant's The source note was submitted and after recording the evidence of the parties in the Appellate Tribunal, no appeal was made in the Appeal Trial Court for the presence, validity and legality of the case, the evidence on the record is that It was proved that the defendant had claimed that he had paid the original amount. The plaintiff with two checks made a profit, but she could not prove it by any evidence, while the evidence on the record had fully proved that the defendant's money was ever paid to the plaintiff. Was not made and was properly pronounced by the trial court. Dismiss

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.