MUHAMMAD JUNAID RAZZAQ versus BAHAUDDIN ZIKARYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR, B.Z.U., MULTAN
Article 199 Constitution Petition = Applicant enrolled in Electrical Engineering Course at Academic University, filed admission form for admission to the University's electrical engineering course on self-finance and paid all required charges, took the entry test and 65 65%. 65 marks, which the complainant applied for was that although he had expressed his preference for the specific category of seats for the candidates who passed the intermediate examination from Multan, his form was not considered. And the admission was not given The applicant stated that he had two admissions They were admitted in the form, the Special Admission Charges seat in the A category and the open category against the B category seat and in the same form a category S seat was preferred and the special admission charges in that form. Was also mentioned and the amount was retained in the form of other forms. The general application form for the Electric Course and the first priority was given in the ical section and the category was mentioned as a Section B petition The validation forms submitted by the applicant did not explicitly state that they Had preferred any type of b \ b \ set if it was stated that in writing the ass b section, the applicant meant a b category b seat then it was in respect of open merit, and so on. The same constitutional application did not change which prompted the University to return the form. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Sita Road lawyer