FATEH MUHAMMAD versus FAQIR MUHAMMAD
Article 32, X 94 and OXV R 10, R ten Law Evidence (Tenth of 1984 1984), Article Constitution 197 Constitution of Pakistan (3 197 Constitution3), Article Constitution 199 Constitution Warrant of the presence of witnesses Appeal for controversial arrest release allowed signatures against those available on contentious documents and minor witnesses were summoned to seek their signature; the trial court erred in failing to present witnesses in response to the summons. Issuance of arrest warrant for arrest, not the power to seek testimony inherited by A. XVI, CPC but also Judgment was in a civil court. If a court were to consider not investing with such power, neither party could give any person any purpose in the process of summoning the parties / witnesses in court. Couldn't ask for. The basic power over which the entire darkness of the suit depends, if such power is not deemed to lie to the court, will be the result of the entire court proceedings if a witness does not appear despite his services or Refusing to appear in court, the trial court was empowered to compel its attendance in the manner prescribed by the Civil Procedure Code; in 1908 the court was empowered under CPC Be the cause of anyone's presence. In order to obtain his signatures for trial purposes, the trial court may not only issue notices in his own court but may also attach the salary or property of a disobedient person who refuses to appear and may be fined, the court In accordance with the provisions of section 94
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Ludhan lawyer