MOHABAT KHAN versus ROBKAR-E-ADALAT
Section 25 juvenile detention wife moved a petition for custody of a minor in Family Court and her application for temporary custody of a minor was granted and she was granted a bail of Rs. 10,000 (Rs. 1 million) in temporary custody. Submitted for presentation of ) In the direction that the juvenile will not be removed from the jurisdiction of the judicial appellant, the trial appellant presented a bail bond before the trial, neither the minors' spouse nor the minors were present in court. It was produced before the court on the relevant date. The court ordered the appellate bond to be executed by the appellant under which the bond was confiscated, but it only raised the issue of why they needed to issue a notice. Should not be received. The record shows that after the confiscation of the bond, the notice was issued to the appellant which was kept on record by the appellant himself, after which, other necessary actions were taken as the appellant to stay out of the country. Could not be served by the trial court. The Shariah was in accordance with the law in view of the facts and legal matters, presenting the review before the court as factual and legal. In the absence of any unlawful absence by the Shariah Court, the appeal to the Supreme Court was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Lala rukh lawyer