MUHAMMAD AKRAM ALIAS KALA versus STATE
Articles 302 (b) and 201 law testimony (1079 1984), Article 40 FIR of the definition of evidence was filed after 10/11 months The incident was an unexpected event and it was last seen and additional judicial confessions The evidence was based on extra-judicial confession witnesses not even mentioned in the FIR The last time the evidence was presented by the complainant's relative who was proof of poor type unless confirmed by irrelevant sources. Indicating the whereabouts of the dead body was found to be unacceptable under Article 40 of the Conan Martyrdom of the accused in police custody, two of the 1984 trial The defendants were already acquitted at trial, with statements from witnesses of extra-judicial confession who were not closely related to the complainant. Safely relied on by some independent evidence without any cooperation The accused was acquitted in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Bhara Kahu lawyer
