Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AKRAM ALIAS KALA versus STATE


Articles 302 (b) and 201 law testimony (1079 1984), Article 40 FIR of the definition of evidence was filed after 10/11 months The incident was an unexpected event and it was last seen and additional judicial confessions The evidence was based on extra-judicial confession witnesses not even mentioned in the FIR The last time the evidence was presented by the complainant's relative who was proof of poor type unless confirmed by irrelevant sources. Indicating the whereabouts of the dead body was found to be unacceptable under Article 40 of the Conan Martyrdom of the accused in police custody, two of the 1984 trial The defendants were already acquitted at trial, with statements from witnesses of extra-judicial confession who were not closely related to the complainant. Safely relied on by some independent evidence without any cooperation The accused was acquitted in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.