Find a Lawyer

GENERAL MANAGER, ADMINISTRATION WING, NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS, MULTAN versus LIAQAT ALI

No direct or indirect evidence was available on record against the appellant's alleged breach of Section 417 (2A) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), section 380/427/436/457, two of the prosecution witnesses reported on the incident. Was completely ignorant and said the witnesses were declared adolescent. And many suggestions were made in which he denied the accused's involvement in the case and his knowledge of the same accused was denied before the court for extra-judicial confession. Judicial confession was, and never was, a very weak category. Considered sufficient to convict anyone, another witness, who was a regular witness, had no help in the prosecution because he admitted that whatever was recovered from the accused in his presence. There is absolutely no evidence for such evidence. The defendant's trial court, in the circumstances, had rightly acquitted the accused of the charges against him, the complainant's confession that after the declaration of crimes in honor of the banks (special courts) ordinance, 1984, The case was specially prosecuted by a special judge, because it was such a baseless effort to raise such questions after such a long time. The suspect was alleged to have stolen cash worth Rs 5 lakh and set it on fire in the bank's premises, which did not include any crime imaginable in the bank, but was able to be found by a common court. There is a trial and a simple trial in which there was no interference case. Following the trial, related to the trial immigration advocates phone number from Chak Sawara lawyer