Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ REHMAN versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 guarantees, the grant of FIR was filed with a delay of approximately eleven hours and stated that the delay was an unknown prosecution witness, under Section 164, Cr P.C. Was inspected, admitted in his mastery. Check that the FIR is listed after deliberation and consultation. The two star witnesses did not utter a single word in their statements under Section 161, CRPC, as well as Section 1,, under CRPC, saying the witnesses did not see the victim on the spot. It also relied on the signal made by the area elders who were brought in at the request of the witnesses. Evidence has revealed that the tracker dogs only indicated the accused's house and that there was another person after the crime. They were identified by the tracker dogs, but said that evidence would be established and that they would see after recording the statements of the prosecution witnesses. d The prosecution neither examined the location elders who administered the tracker dogs nor the description of the person bringing the tracker dogs. There was not enough evidence on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime; the accused was admitted in bail, under circumstances advocate for immigration from Turbat lawyer