IFTIKHAR ALIAS JARMAN versus STATE
Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Drug Control (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001, R4 (2) bail, shown as accused's grant boy But the request of the Investigation Officer addressing his exact age chemical inspector was not mentioned. Chemical Examiner's report dated 25 2 2005 shows that the parcels were received in the laboratory on 12 3 2005, the prosecution had to explain the delay between 25 2 2005 and 12 3. In light of R4 (2) of the 2005 Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Regulations, 2001 and to prove that the sample was safe during the said period, which was not done, in keeping with the accused's inferiority The quantity and investigation of marijuana, the accused was allowed to bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Bhalwal lawyer
