Find a Lawyer

MST. PASHAM JANA versus BASHIR KHAN

Section 4 324 / Cri34 Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 439 Increase in punishment and application for claims for payment of good respondents, effectively injured the applicant by firing. The petitioner claimed to pay a fine of Rs 100, saying that the trial court had taken a gentle attitude and imposed a lower sentence on him despite the crime of attempting to commit the murder of Kalam. Respondents had committed the felonious crime of shooting the woman who had injured her. The woman was injured on the leg with the use of firearms, which was unusual in the culture of the area when the honor of women was even more protected by the hardened criminals but the act of the accused was unforgivable and deserved that They could be dealt with severely, but because the respondents had already passed completely. Period of imprisonment and he did not appeal against his sentence; any increase in the period of imprisonment will not be extravagant. The trial imposed a fine as well as a fine which imposed a fine of Rs. The amount of compensation was not, however, to be levied by the trial court through the trial and it is payable to the applicants / victims, but said that the mandatory portion was ignored. The trial court, which was the trial court's unlawful decision, revised the score under which the criminal review filed by the applicant was partially accepted and the case was remanded to the trial court so that the applicant / Determine the amount of damages the complainant will receive based on his or her expenses. Also hurt how to become a advocate from Dijkot lawyer