Find a Lawyer

AYAZ KHAN versus STATE

The provisions of Sections 302, 419, 420, 468 and 471 were not appreciated nor were they made as prosecution witnesses whose investigations are extremely dishonest. There was no ocular account available in this case and the fate of the entire case depended on the evidence to hear the prosecutor's story regarding the circumstances of the record, as no one was presented to confirm it. Trial executions can only be granted on the basis of unreliable, reliable and reliable evidence that was almost missing in the present case; Yes, it was no help to the prosecution The trial court overturned the prescriptive rule, prosecuting the capital charges only on the statement of a co-accused accused under F-34 law and justice, The CP did not allow the rule of law to conflict with the FIR version Given that such a statement could be sentenced to a suspect accused of a capital. Every possibility of false evidence recorded under section 342, CCPC, has to be excluded in case of circumstantial evidence. Such evidence must be very high and all links should be made a chain that is dead on one end. The body touches while the other end is connected. The neck of the accused with the commission of the crime leaves nothing to speculate on. The present case was based on the weakest case; the prosecutor, in those circumstances, failed to link the accused in any way with which The accused have been convicted and sentenced to trial court list of advocates from Talagang lawyer