ABDUL QAYYUM versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, ANTI-CORRUPTION AJK, MUZAFFARABAD
Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 47 (3) voluntary retirement appellant who himself transferred the application for retirement on the basis of domestic problems, appellant received all his benefits including pension etc. ? Applicant challenged his retirement before the service tribunal, which was alleged under the law, alleging that his application for retirement was threatened with severe and serious consequences. Was submitted, the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the service tribunal, the correctness of the service tribunal after the proper tribunal of the evidence dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants against their retirement order. Had done Appellant's argument that he was obliged to submit a retirement application under threats and the dire consequences could not be accepted as he could commit genocide because of the move. Such a request, but not later, to obtain the data against the written document and report the matter must be against the higher written document, which must be very strong oral evidence to deny, which was missing in this case. The person who appealed to the party and invited the invitations could not avail. As a result of the order, the appellant's conduct did not allow him to question rigor and repression after he was accepted into a position. Then dismissed the appeal before the service tribunal against the Supreme Court against the decision of the service tribunal went.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
