Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus SARDAR MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN

Preparation of sections of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act, 1975, Sections 6 and 7, the purpose of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 was to hold a speedy hearing to decide the matters relating to the services of public servants and to achieve that purpose. , The legislature tolerated it. Plug in the lacones by adding subsections (1) and (5) to section 6 of the said Act that the Chairman may constitute a single or division bench to hear appeals under the Act if only one member has proceeded with the action. If it were, it would not be the case. The illegal and ineffective government was obliged to appoint a chairman or member under section 7 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975, as the case may be, if the chairman or member was temporarily vacant at the hearing. And to hear the Member, all such steps were for the ultimate purpose, that is, the decision of the case, which was made formal by Section 6 (2) of Section 6 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribune. Under the Act, 1975 and this section, if it is concluded by a single member or division bench, it shall be placed before the Tribunal as a whole, if it shall decide in this case, if there are two under the Tribunal. There would be more members. Under Section 6 (1) of Section 6 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975, the Chairman was eligible to constitute a single or division bench for hearing the appeals and the hearing would mean a mere hearing and not a single decision. Or reached by division. After the hearing, the bench was to be placed before the full bench, which contradicts the provisions of section 6 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975. criminal advocate from Nowshera Cantt lawyer